The Changes and Management of Infestation of <i>Agrilus planipennis</i> in China

Maimaitijiang·Rouzi; Yanlong Zhang; Xiaoyi Wang

doi:10.12356/j.2096-8884.2024-0006

Volume 4 Issue 1

Feb. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Terrestrial Ecosystem and Conservation > 2024 > 4(1): 86-92

Maimaitijiang·Rouzi, Yanlong Zhang, Xiaoyi Wang. The Changes and Management of Infestation of Agrilus planipennis in China[J]. Terrestrial Ecosystem and Conservation, 2024, 4(1): 86-92. doi: 10.12356/j.2096-8884.2024-0006

Citation:

Maimaitijiang·Rouzi, Yanlong Zhang, Xiaoyi Wang. The Changes and Management of Infestation of Agrilus planipennis in China[J]. Terrestrial Ecosystem and Conservation, 2024, 4(1): 86-92. doi: 10.12356/j.2096-8884.2024-0006

Citation:

PDF( 498 KB)

The Changes and Management of Infestation of Agrilus planipennis in China

doi: 10.12356/j.2096-8884.2024-0006

1.
Xinjiang Forestry School, Urumqi 830026, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Forest Protection of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China

Received Date: 2024-01-21
Accepted Date: 2024-04-08

Available Online: 2024-04-18

Publish Date: 2024-02-01

Abstract

Abstract

Agrilus planipennis is a native insect pest in China, and has not caused serious damage to local Fraxinus trees previously. However, in recent years, with the widespread planting of exotic Fraxinus trees, A. planipennis has evolved from a secondary pest to a major pest in China, causing great damage to Fraxinus trees in landscaping and afforestation, and posing a serious threat to the environment. In this article, the outbreak reasons of A. planipennis and the current situation of its control, especially the use of natural enemies in recent years were summarized. It was found that the use of natural enemies is one of the fundamental factors in controlling the insect population and damage. The use of biological control combined with multiple measures is an effective method to control the spread of A. planipennis and reduce ecological and economic losses. The article can provide a experience for the prevention and control of other trunk-boring pests.
- Agrilus planipennis,
- trunk-boring pest,
- introduced ash trees,
- Fraxinus sogdiana,
- biological control

FullText(HTML)

References(51)

References

[1]	阿不都瓦哈·艾再孜, 程晓甜, 张捷, 等, 2022. 玛纳斯平原林场白蜡窄吉丁成虫发生动态及生活史研究[J]. 农业技术与装备, (8): 140-142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-887X.2022.08.048
[2]	崔元秦, 2022. 新疆白蜡窄吉丁生物学特性及防治技术研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学.
[3]	崔志军, 欧阿力别克·巴依朱马, 夏力哈尔·努尔旦别克, 2023. 白蜡窄吉丁综合防治技术[J]. 农村科技, (6): 38-40. doi: 10.19777/j.cnki.issn1002-6193.2023.06.011
[4]	党英侨, 王小艺, 2021. 利用改进方法预测白蜡窄吉丁在国内的适生区[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 43(6): 1368-1375. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2021.06.04
[5]	党英侨, 王小艺, 杨忠岐, 2018. 天敌昆虫在我国林业害虫生物防治上的研究进展[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 40(2): 242-255. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2018.02.2
[6]	高宇, 王志英, 熊忠平, 等, 2009. 白蜡吉丁啮小蜂生物学特性研究[J]. 防护林科技, (3): 38-41. doi: 10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2009.03.031
[7]	胡庆玲, 2016. 白蜡窄吉丁(Agrilus planipennis)研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 44(7): 5-7. doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2016.07.002
[8]	廖小龙, 史开奇, 李斌, 等, 2021. 白蜡窄吉丁危害及防治[J]. 农业与技术, 41(15): 85-87. doi: 10.19754/j.nyyjs.20210815022
[9]	刘海清, 马润生, 李庆海, 1996. 梣小吉丁虫的调查研究及防治技术[J]. 天津农林科技, (1): 46-48. doi: 10.16013/j.cnki.1002-0659.1996.01.039
[10]	刘丽云, 朱涵珍, 2016. 白蜡窄吉丁危害及防治研究进展[J]. 河南农业, (4): 42-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-950X.2016.04.021
[11]	刘泽勇, 张建国, 李秀梅, 等, 2022. 河北省白蜡窄吉丁发生情况调研[J]. 河北林业科技, (4): 41-46. doi: 10.16449/j.cnki.issn1002-3356.2022.04.001
[12]	刘振凯, 赵瑞兴, 栾庆书, 等, 2011. 白蜡吉丁啮小蜂生物学特性及其对寄主自然控制作用的影响[J]. 中国森林病虫, 30(3): 20-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2011.03.007
[13]	刘忠军, 2019. 新疆外来林业有害生物入侵现状及趋势分析[J]. 新疆林业, (2): 37-41,48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3522.2019.02.015
[14]	路纪芳, 蔡静芸, 展茂魁, 等, 2017. 白蜡窄吉丁幼虫及其天敌的种群空间生态位研究[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 54(3): 506-514. doi: 10.7679/j.issn.2095-1353.2017.062
[15]	路纪芳, 王小艺, 杨忠岐, 2012. 中国白蜡窄吉丁研究进展[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 49(3): 785-792.
[16]	路纪芳, 王智勇, 杨忠岐, 等, 2013. 基于特定时间调查数据组建的白蜡窄吉丁种群生命表[J]. 昆虫学报, 56(11): 1294-1305. doi: 10.16380/j.kcxb.2013.11.014
[17]	潘志刚, 游应天, 1994. 中国主要外来树种引种栽培[M]. 北京: 北京科学技术出版社, 632-643.
[18]	覃建国, 王正友, 刘世虎, 等, 2023. 白蜡窄吉丁发生规律及综合防治技术[J]. 农村科技, (5): 36-38. doi: 10.19777/j.cnki.issn1002-6193.2023.05.012
[19]	孙铁环, 李庆海, 2004. 天津市森林病虫害发生及防治对策[J]. 天津农林科技, (2): 1-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0659.2004.02.001
[20]	孙元, 王皙玮, 段建军, 等, 2013. 白蜡窄吉丁综合防控研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 29(18): 158-161. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2012-2922
[21]	王小艺, 2005. 白蜡窄吉丁的生物学及其生物防治研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院.
[22]	王小艺, 党英侨, 魏可, 等, 2021a. 一种白蜡吉丁卵跳小蜂饲养方法及在防治白蜡窄吉丁中的应用: CN112335613A, 02.09 [P]. 2021-02-09.
[23]	王小艺, 党英侨, 魏可, 等, 2021b. 一种白蜡吉丁啮小蜂饲养方法及在防治白蜡窄吉丁中的应用: CN112385611A, 02.23 [P]. 2021-02-23.
[24]	王小艺, 杨忠岐, 2005. 白蜡窄吉丁幼虫及其天敌在空间格局上的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 16(8): 1427-1431. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2005.0170
[25]	王小艺, 杨忠岐, Gould J R, 等, 2015. 白蜡窄吉丁(鞘翅目: 吉丁甲科)的生物防治研究进展[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 31(5): 666-678. doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2015.05.007
[26]	王小艺, 杨忠岐, 武辉, 等, 2007. 白蜡吉丁柄腹茧蜂的寄生和繁殖生物学[J]. 昆虫学报, 50(9): 920-926. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0454-6296.2007.09.009
[27]	魏霞, Reardon D, 吴云, 等, 2004. 白蜡窄吉丁虫在中国的研究现状与分布调查[J]. 昆虫学报, 47(5): 679-685. doi: 10.16380/j.kcxb.2004.05.021
[28]	武辉, 2007. 白蜡窄吉丁寄生蜂的生物学特性和繁育技术研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学.
[29]	武辉, 王小艺, 李孟楼, 等, 2008. 白蜡吉丁肿腿蜂的生物学和生态学特性及繁殖技术研究[J]. 昆虫学报, 51(1): 46-54. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0454-6296.2008.01.008
[30]	杨忠岐, 2004. 利用天敌昆虫控制我国重大林木害虫研究进展[J]. 中国生物防治杂志, 20(4): 221-227. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-039X.2004.04.001
[31]	杨忠岐, 王小艺, 曹亮明, 等, 2014. 管氏肿腿蜂的再描述及中国硬皮肿腿蜂属Sclerodermus(Hymenoptera: Bethylidae)的种类[J]. 中国生物防治学报, 30(1): 1-12. doi: 10.16409/j.cnki.2095-039x.2014.01.011
[32]	张良玉, 陈周羡, 1995. 绒毛白蜡吉丁虫防治技术的研究[J]. 园林科技通讯, (4): 1-7.
[33]	张孟军, 翟淑芬, 刘立民, 2013. 长春地区白蜡吉丁天敌种类与自然寄生率的研究[J]. 吉林林业科技, 42(6): 22-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7129.2013.06.010
[34]	赵汗青, 王小艺, 杨忠歧, 等, 2006. 检疫性害虫——白蜡窄吉丁[J]. 植物检疫, 20(2): 89-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2755.2006.02.010
[35]	赵同海, 高瑞桐, Liu H P, 等, 2005. 花曲柳窄吉丁的寄主植物范围、危害和防治对策[J]. 昆虫学报, 48(4): 594-599. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0454-6296.2005.04.019
[36]	赵同海, 赵文霞, 高瑞桐, 等, 2007. 外来树种对本地林业虫害的诱发作用[J]. 昆虫学报, 50(8): 826-833. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0454-6296.2007.08.011
[37]	Dang Y Q, Wei K, Wang X Y, et al, 2022. Introduced plants induce outbreaks of a native pest and facilitate invasion in the plants' native range: evidence from the emerald ash borer[J]. Journal of Ecology, 110(3): 593-604. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13822
[38]	Duan J J, Driesche R G V, Crandall R S, et al, 2019. Establishment and early impact of Spathius galinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in the Northeastern United States[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 112(5): 2121-2130. doi: 10.1093/jee/toz159
[39]	Duan, J J, Bauer L S, Van Driesche R G, et al, 2018. Progress and challenges of protecting North American ash trees from the emerald ash borer using biological control.[J]. Forests, 9(3): 142. doi: 10.3390/f9030142
[40]	Duan, J J, Taylor P B, Fuester R W, et al, 2013. Hymenopteran parasitoids attacking the invasive emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in western and central Pennsylvania[J]. Florida Entomologist, 96(1): 166-172. doi: 10.1653/024.096.0122
[41]	George D, Duan J J, Tallamy D, et al, 2020. Effects of parental diapause status and release time on field reproductive biology of the introduced egg parasitoid, Oobius agrili (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) in the Mid-Atlantic: implications for biocontrol of the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae)[J]. Biological Control, 149: 104342. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104342
[42]	Hausman C E, Jaeger J F, Rocha O J, et al, 2010. Impacts of the emerald ash borer (EAB) eradication and tree mortality: potential for a secondary spread of invasive plant species[J]. Biological Invasions, 12(7): 2013-2023. doi: 10.1007/s10530-009-9604-3
[43]	Hope E S, McKenney D W, Pedlar J H, et al, 2021. Canadian efforts to slow the spread of Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) are economically efficient[J]. Ecological Economics, 188: 107126. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107126
[44]	Liu H, Bauer L S, Gao R, et al, 2003. Exploratory survey for the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), and its natural enemies in China[J]. The Great Lakes Entomologist, 36(3): 11. doi: 10.22543/0090-0222.2093
[45]	Murphy T C, Van Driesche R G, Gould J R, et al, 2017. Can Spathius galinae attack emerald ash borer larvae feeding in large ash trees? [J]. Biological Control, 114(1): 8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.07.004
[46]	Petrice T R, Miller D L, Bauer L S, et al, 2019. Photoperiodic modulation of diapause induction and termination in Oobius agrili Zhang and Huang (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), an egg parasitoid of the invasive emerald ash borer[J]. Biological Control, 138: 104047. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104047
[47]	Ragozzino M, Duan J J, Salom S, 2021. Responses of two introduced larval parasitoids to the invasive emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) infesting a novel host plant, white fringe tree: implication for biological control[J]. Biological Control, 160: 104672. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104672
[48]	Wang X Y, Yang Z Q, Gould J R, et al, 2010. The biology and ecology of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, in China[J]. Journal of Insect Science, 10(1): 128. doi: 10.1673/031.010.12801
[49]	Yang Z Q, Strazanac J S, Marsh P M, et al, 2005. First recorded parasitoid from china of Agrilus planipennis: a new species of Spathius (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Doryctinae)[J]. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 98(5): 636-642. doi: 10.1603/0013-8746(2005)098[0636:FRPFCO]2.0.CO;2
[50]	Yang Z Q, Strazanac J S, Yao Y X, et al, 2006. A new species of emerald ash borer parasitoid from China belonging to the genus Tetrastichus haliday (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae)[J]. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 108(3): 550-558.
[51]	Zhang Y Z, Huang D W, Zhao T H, et al, 2005. Two new species of egg parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) of wood-boring beetle pests from China[J]. Phytoparasitica, 33(3): 253-260. doi: 10.1007/BF02979863